McCain to offer distinction on Cuba policy
By Brandozilla Posted in Foreign Affairs — Comments (3) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
John McCain is set to give a speech today in Miami, discussing US policy toward Cuba.
With Fidel reportedly still on his deathbed, Cuba policy will be a hot issue this summer and fall.
McCain's remarks will include the following:
Tyranny will not forever endure, and as president, I will not passively await the day when the Cuban people enjoy the blessings of freedom and democracy. It is in our national interest to support their aspirations and oppose those of the Castro regime, one that harbors fugitives from U.S. justice, expresses unrelenting hostility to America, and shoots down unarmed civilian aircraft.
I wish the other presidential candidates felt similarly. Just a few years ago, Sen. Obama had a very clear view on Cuba. When asked in a questionnaire about his policy toward Cuba, he answered: [b]"I believe that normalization of relations with Cuba would help the oppressed and poverty-stricken Cuban people while setting the stage for a more democratic government once Castro inevitably leaves the scene."[/b]
Now Senator Obama has shifted positions and says he only favors easing the embargo, not lifting it. [b]He also wants to sit down unconditionally for a presidential meeting with Raul Castro. These steps would send the worst possible signal to Cuba’s dictators –- there is no need to undertake fundamental reforms, they can simply wait for a unilateral change in US policy. [/b]
I believe we should give hope to the Cuban people, not to the Castro regime. My administration will press the Cuban regime to release all political prisoners unconditionally, to legalize all political parties, labor unions, and free media, and to schedule internationally monitored elections. The embargo must stay in place until these basic elements of democratic society are met.
A President Obama will give away the farm to Raul, unconditionally - and at a time when Cuba will the ripest for change it has been throughout Fidel's regime.
A President McCain will demand democratic change, free elections and the release of political prisoners.
The policy the next President takes towards Cuba will also send a message as to what is acceptable to other South American Castro Wannabes (See Chavez, Hugo).
This is just another point reinforcing the necessity of a McCain presidency.
If McCain really wants to deal a blow to Obama's policy towards Cuba, he should really emphasize how unions are outlawed in Cuba. The argument should go something like this:
If Obama is so worried about Labor Unions in Colombia and does not support a Free Trade Agreement with our ally because of that precondition, why does the worry about organized labor fall below the waist side when it comes to Cuba?
This will likely drive a wedge between Obama and Labor Unions, as his take on Cuba is not union friendly.
He does mention the unions in his remarks, but if he puts emphasis on this it could play pretty well in union states.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Game it's nice that you're hyperpartisan
by kowalskiVA-2
by dittoheadOn the other hand, let's not sugarcoat it
by kowalskiAh, a movie buff
by DrJaysonFosterI know.
by kowalskiActually he is a pretty
by dld1717If it was under U.N. "control" since 1992, who controlled it
by Tim SchiefereckeIs LA6 going to be hard to win?
by SteveLAWhy is this race even close?
by shooflyguy68I believe that a lot more than 550
by kowalskiI agree with you, gamecock
by pilgrimMercy on his soul? Did he kill or rape someone we didn't
by Tim SchiefereckeThe physical size is nominal, that's true ...
by rbdwigginsYou are absolutely right
by DrJaysonFosterI'll bet pilgrim agrees with me - nt
by gamecockA Good Point
by KC
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com




Obama's position on Cuba will likely turn Florida solidly red. His policy towards the Super Castro Brothers needs to be played up as much as his policy toward Ahmadinijad.
(How about that, I got Ahmadinijad's spelling correct before I googled for it)