Lt. Cmdr. Matthew Diaz: Portrait of a Traitor

By Chris Jones Posted in Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

In today's New York Times I was disturbed to read about another left-wing hero/American traitor. Every once in a while the military finds itself with a turncoat within its ranks and that person is usually dealt with swiftly. Unfortunately, the turncoat usually does significant damage before he is discovered.

That was the situation with Lt. Cmdr. Matthew Diaz who was stationed at the American detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Diaz enlisted in the Army as a 17-year-old high-school dropout. He had earned his college degree while serving as an artillery sergeant and then completed law school. In 10 years as a Navy lawyer, his performance evaluations had been outstanding.

With another promotion all but certain and his 6-month tour at Gitmo nearing its end, Lt. Cmdr. Diaz decided to throw it all away and betray his country.

Sitting at a secure desktop computer, he printed out page after page of classified information. When he was done, Diaz had assembled a document 39 pages long. In tiny type, it listed names, prison serial numbers and other information for each of the 551 men who were then being held by the United States at Guantanamo Bay.

For nearly two weeks after printing the list, he kept it locked inside the safe in his office. He later trimmed the pages down to the size of index cards, and slipped the pages inside a Valentine's Day card he had purchased at the base store.

Diaz then mailed the classified documents to the New York offices of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a left-wing legal-advocacy group that was among the most zealous opponents of the Bush administration’s Guantanamo policy.

The center was then suing the government on a range of sensitive issues including the Patriot Act, immigrants’ rights, and of course Guantanamo.

To their credit the Center turned the documents over to the Justice Department. A short investigation by the F.B.I. revealed that Diaz had printed the documents from his computer and had left his fingerprints all over them.

This past May, Matthew Diaz became the only United States serviceman to be convicted and imprisoned for an act of insubordination directed at the Bush administration’s detention policies.

On May 18 this year, after a weeklong trial, a panel of seven naval officers convicted Diaz on four of five counts, including one of disclosing secret defense information that “could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation.”

After a few crocodile tears in front of a jury he was only sentenced to 6 months in prison, a dishonorable discharge, and permanent loss of his law license.

The article in the NY Times portrays Diaz as some kind of martyr who wanted to do the right thing no matter what the cost.

When you join the military you follow orders and shut the hell up. You certainly don't release documents that have been deemed classified because YOU think they shouldn't have been.

Lt. Cmdr. Matthew Diaz is a disgrace to the uniform he wore and to his country. He is extremely lucky to have only received six months in prison, because 10 years would have been far more appropriate.

We have a big enough problem with liberal activists trying to undermine the war effort from the outside without having those people do damage from the inside as well.

By Chris Jones
The Hot Joints

"Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?" (Macaulay)

A meeting in the afterlife... by grumpy_old_soldier

Perhaps this disgraced traitor will have the "pleasure" of meeting US Navy SEAL commander LT. Michael Murphy for a bit of "wall-to-wall" counseling on his day of judgment.

is reserved for traitors, Mr. Diaz. Zone 2 seems to be a perfect fit for you.

My only hope is that the powers that be are reserving a nice, cool, cozy place there for you to spend eternity.

Cretin.

-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

gone after leakers in the CIA & NSA.

God! how I've come to detest the concept of "compassion".
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I think it's unbelievable that over and over again people at CIA leak classified programs to the NY Times, and nobody ever goes to jail.

It keeps happening because there are never any consequences for it. Leakers and turncoats should be found and dealt with whether in the military or civilian intelligence community.

Someone leaks and Bush publicly condemns, someone else leaks and bush publicly condemns.

If the next guy at CIA who leaks gets 10 or 20 years in a Federal prison, we'll just see how many more leaks you see after that.

Feed your brain at The Hot Joints

I can at least imagine some rationale, however flawed, for some of things about Bush that irritate me; but I've never understood why he and his underlings don't seriously prosecute the people leaking classified material.

Because it's usually nearly impossible to catch a leaker. Even the most highly classified actions are handled by hundreds of people, and a Top Secret war plan for a major military campaign can easily be exposed to thousands of people in dozens of federal agencies over several years. Unless the reporter fingers his source, the government has no way to identify the leak.

"If all men were just, there would be no need of valor."
- Agesilaus

the will to do it.

1. Lock down CIA/NSA facilities.
2. Ask for the leaker/s to come forward with no immunity but 5 yr prison terms.
3. Polygraph EVERY employee. Any who don't pass go straight to jail for further questioning. In Romania if necessary.
4. Empanel a grand jury simultaneously.
5. Call reporters, editors, publishers and ask who they got the info from.
6. If they won't give up names they go to prison for contempt to solitary. No contact with anyone but their attorneys and no communication with anyone.
7. If the won't give up their sources, as soon as the current GJ is dismissed empanel a new one and repeat the process.
8. The press does not set foot outside solitary until they give up their sources.

The leakers get the absolute max in a hell hole when convicted. It wouldn't be a bad thing if they died in prison.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I like it Becker by virgil

But why not hang them after conviction?

It's a sad fact that most federal agencies (and military services) engage in selective leaking as a tactic in their beltway battles with other agencies.

I was once involved in getting SECDEF approval of a highly classified action that the State Dept opposed. It was approved on a Friday. On Sunday I read about it in the Washington Post.

"If all men were just, there would be no need of valor."
- Agesilaus

I think you make a very valid point. It's almost become a culture of leaking especially at CIA.

People interested in this topic should read Sabotage: America's Enemies Within the CIA by Rowan Scarborough.

Just like this Diaz character, individuals at the agency who disagree with a policy just leak it.

According to the book they have to be careful about appearing to "Clean House" at the agency for fear of lowering moral.

I find it both fascinating and disturbing that our intelligence community has become a politically correct bureaucracy.

Of course the intelligence was so good on Iraq, I can understand not wanting to ruffle feathers.

Feed your brain at The Hot Joints


blog advertising is good for you


Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service