THE 4TH OF JULY IN SAMARRA, IRAQ


Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.

California ACTIVIST Supreme Court - they don't follow the law - they make the law

By eschristian Posted in Comments (4) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

No matter a persons opinion on the subject of gay marriage the real problem is that judges (California Supreme Court) became activists and overruled the law and the vote of the people. California voters had already voted on this matter Proposition 22 (or Prop 22) PREVENTED California from recognizing same-sex marriages. Voters adopted the measure on March 7, 2000 with 61.4% in favor of Prop 22. When the judicial branch overreaches and does the job of the other 2 branches and overrules and changes the vote of the people the balance of power is no longer balanced.

If a group of people or an individual does not like the law as written then go to their/your legislature representatives and work with them and the executive branch to change the law - it is NOT the job of the judicial branch to change laws or MAKE laws that suits their beliefs and wants. The job of the judicial branch is to rule on the law as written NOT rewrite the law to suit the judges thoughts on the matter. This is a slippery slope we are on when the judicial branch does as they please - activist judges are as dangerous as liberalism and Islamofascism as all 3 undermine the foundation our country was built on and if left unchecked and ignore these blatant actions which destroys the balance of power our government was founded on can destroy our country and it's foundation.

Mike Huckabee also made another point which I had not thought of which showed me the importance of a Constitutional amendment defining marriage is between ONE man and ONE woman - he sited the polygamy groups in Texas as another example of why we need this amendment. I pretty much think that if an action is LEGAL and between consenting adults then those actions are between those consenting adults and God and I am not to judge them, but when you bring children into a situation then that is where the trouble begins - children cannot legally consent to anything except abortion which activist judges enabled children to do which I believe a child CANNOT legally consent to anything by themselves - with a parent's (adult) consent they can.

Like Rush Limbaugh always says liberalism is never going to be satisfied - if you give them an inch they take a billion miles. Let's say we never define through a Constitutional amendment marriage being between ONE man and ONE woman what's next polygamy becomes legal, NAMBA makes it legal for sick child molesters to be able to marry their victims??? I could go on and on and on because when you force yourself to think like a liberal you can go to some far fetched places because they believe in emotions not facts or laws so if they like the "feeling of it" then they go with it and if you disagree with their feelings then they you call you whatever kind of thing it is - monger.

If you want to think like a liberal (as you need to know your enemy to defeat them) then don't think logically or with facts - liberals do not believe in facts - think about how it feels. A great example of this is Barack Hussein Obama when asked the question that it has been proven that when you raise capital gains taxes that the revenue taken into the government decreases - he said ummm ummmm (which is code for Obama that no teleprompter with prepared answers is in sight) and babbled a little bit and then said what he really thought and FELT - it does not matter even if the government takes in less money we can punish the rich people - that is Liberalism 101 my friends.

I believe Limbaugh nailed it when he said liberalism is MORE dangerous than Islamofascists - liberalism do their own dangerous policies/actions and they see nothing wrong with Islamofascism - now that is dangerous.

However, want to know the kicker to this court's ruling - 6 judges were Republican appointed - ruling was 4-3 in favor of this activist decision not based on the votes of the people or the law - see what happens when you water down Republicans and get activist judges.

Purple is my favorite color but not in politics - when you water down red and add it to dark liberal blue you get disaster. Conservative principles and values are what can save our Republic, purple moderate independent and liberal type of thinking will just continue to destroy our great Nation and completely destroy the Republic - again Limbaugh was genius with the statement liberalism is more dangerous than Islamofascism - it is TRUE. This includes liberal activist judges - no matter what party appointed them - if it walks like a liberal and whines like a liberal and votes like a liberal then guess what IT"S A LIBERAL no matter what party they are in!!!!

*sigh* by iconoclast

It is not the responsibility of any government to legitimize and institutionalize every single perversion that people can come up with. Why is that so hard for people to understand?

About that term by SteveLA

iconoclast

I don't know if you live in California, but I do, and you are not helping with what the real issue is with your moralizing comments.

I am fairly Libertarian, but I am steamed at this decision and not over some moralistic condemnation of gay marriage that you choose to use. No I am steamed at the pure arrogance of any court to overturn the will of the people of California as expressed in prop 22 to state what we believe is an appropriate definition of marriage.

I could care less about the underlying issue, we decided that one when we the people of Califorina voted for prop 22. I care about Judges overturning the will of the people. It's wrong, and it's what I will fight against.

I will be voting in favor of a California constitutional amendment to reflect the will of the people of the state of California on this matter that had already been expressed and not based your or any other moralizing person's interpretation of what is perverted or not. If you want to take this fight into the mind field of moralization, then you will help loose the battle, pure and simple. It's ether the will of the people, all the people or the will of judges, I vote for the will of the people.

______________________________________
Proud member of the Barry Goldwater wing of the party !

No matter a persons opinion on the subject of gay marriage the real problem is that judges (California Supreme Court) became activists and overruled the law and the vote of the people.

*true* by eschristian

But it is also the job of the 3 branches of government to perform as founded by our founding fathers in the Constitution and NOT try to do the jobs of the other 2 branches - that is what this written for.


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service