McCain and HAMAS
By Indicus Posted in Foreign Affairs — Comments (4) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
To give credit where credit is due, a Kos Kid managed to uncover this rather unflattering interview with John McCain:
Given that McCain obviously says differently now, and I'll take him at his work, I'm curious about when he made that decision and how. Anyone know?
Indicus
Which is more or less what I was expecting:
“There should be no confusion, John McCain has always believed that serious engagement would require mandatory conditions and Hamas must change itself fundamentally – renounce violence, abandon its goal of eradicating Israel and accept a two state solution. John McCain’s position is clear and has always been clear, the President of the United States should not unconditionally meet with leaders of Iran, Hamas or Hezbollah. Barack Obama has made his position equally clear, and has pledged to meet unconditionally with Iran’s leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the leaders of other rogue regimes, which shows incredibly dangerous and weak judgment.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0508/McCain_camp_pushes_bac...
is not exactly unflattering. It does not exclude preconditions. It doesn't say that the way we will "deal" with them is formal negotiations. It does not rule out either diplomatic or military means for "dealing" with them. In fact taking that clip out of context as KOS did, you can take twist it into a threat against Hamas.
Socialism doesn't work. It looks nice on paper, but it's been tried and it's failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Here's Mac's statement the very day after the elections:
In the wake of yesterday’s Palestinian elections, Hamas must change itself fundamentally - renounce violence, abandon its goal of eradicating Israel and accept the two-state solution. These elections are evidence that democracy is indeed spreading in the Middle East, but Hamas is not a partner for peace so long as they advocate the overthrow of Israel.
H/t HotAir. Ed has a post up debunking this:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/16/mccains-hamas-comments-context-res...
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Game it's nice that you're hyperpartisan
by kowalskiVA-2
by dittoheadOn the other hand, let's not sugarcoat it
by kowalskiAh, a movie buff
by DrJaysonFosterI know.
by kowalskiActually he is a pretty
by dld1717If it was under U.N. "control" since 1992, who controlled it
by Tim SchiefereckeIs LA6 going to be hard to win?
by SteveLAWhy is this race even close?
by shooflyguy68I believe that a lot more than 550
by kowalskiI agree with you, gamecock
by pilgrimMercy on his soul? Did he kill or rape someone we didn't
by Tim SchiefereckeThe physical size is nominal, that's true ...
by rbdwigginsYou are absolutely right
by DrJaysonFosterI'll bet pilgrim agrees with me - nt
by gamecockA Good Point
by KC
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



I dug into this a little and, long story short, in context McCain seems to have been saying he'd talk to Hamas if they renounced violence and anti-Israel sentiment first, which isn't IMHO a particularly startling thing to say. I've got a blog about this:
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/derannimer/2008/may/16/mccain_obama_and_ha...
(Hope it's not bad form to mention that, but I don't want to redo all that typing.)