C3PO, the She-Nerd's McDreamy
By Uma Richie Posted in Life Issues — Comments (13) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
It is a truth academically purported, that a single man in possession of no social skills, must be in want of a fembot.
The Marriage Amendment was never a hot button issue for me. Sure, I support it -- Marriage, one man, one woman, got it, can we move on? I never considered the institution of marriage a potential slippery slope victim.
Then I discovered robot love.
After the fiasco of my first post , I abandoned my efforts on the follow-up “Cavalry Carnage in the American Civil War” and clicked over to Scientific American. For those not familiar with that publication, it targets an academic audience looking to keep apace of technological developments outside their chosen field. If you can muscle past the anti-God arrogance of the editorial staff, it is an interesting read. However left it leans, it is certainly not a periodical on the fringe.
There I found the article "Not Tonight, Dear, I Have to Reboot" which explores the possibility of marriage between humans, particularly anti-social ones, and robots. You may have read similar stories over the past few months. What bothered me about this particular piece was the publication that carried it. More suitable for a Larry Flynt smut mag than a so-called science periodical, the article gives new meaning to the words “Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto.”
I will refrain from posting the tawdry details; however, there are two quotes that provide insight into how David Levy, the researcher on this project, feels about humans and marriage.
In a question and answer segment, the clearly misogynist Levy states, “Then I got the idea that sex with dolls is like sex with prostitutes—you know the prostitute doesn't love you and care for you, is only interested in the size of your wallet.”
Where is the outrage from liberal feminists?
Later he says, “I think the nature of marriage in the future is that it will be what we want it to be. If you and your partner decide to be married, you decide what the bounds are, what its purpose is to you.”
Scientific American’s decision to grant credibility to Levy’s work tells me everything I need to know about the left’s designs for marriage. Levy is British, but I nominate federal funding of any similar American research for the chopping block in the first round of McCain era spending cuts.
And, yes, sign me up for that Marriage Amendment.
It is Scientific American's credibility. Really, what the bloody heck is the matter with those guys? I would say that they are better than that, but in my personal observation they've been slipping the last decade, in terms of their status as a legitimate science magazine
Kill the terrorists
Protect the borders
Punch the hippies -- Frank J
I've only been a subscriber since 2002. I have a litany of complaints about SciAm, but I continue to read because it bridges the gap between Popular Science and the journals.
n/t
"This is the future we can all look forward to when these cultist "society" creators are swept into power by the sodomites and coke fiends of the press corps."...GO
Because, well.....I mean, besides the Kill Bill movies and Poison Ivy, she played the Widow Emma Peel in the Avengers, for gosh sakes!
Kill the terrorists
Protect the borders
Punch the hippies -- Frank J
I don't think they recognized the formula they had - dapper stud, SMOKING hot chick, and weekly bad guys. The chicks they brought in after Diana Rigg were, well.....NOT Diana Rigg. A shame, really. I want a bowler that doubles as a weapon.
Kill the terrorists
Protect the borders
Punch the hippies -- Frank J
I guess she'll settle for C3PO, if Dark helmet isn't available...
"I believe we must adjourn this meeting to some other place." - The last recorded words of Adam Smith.
"I believe we must adjourn this meeting to some other place." - The last recorded words of Adam Smith.
I commend you on the decadence of this entire piece. We should do stuff like this at work more often.
"I believe we must adjourn this meeting to some other place." - The last recorded words of Adam Smith.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
A shorter way
by simpson316Good point, boychik!
by bantamwaitMass produced thin film
by moderichGotcha. Thanks.
by simpson316Actually, he was just lashing out.
by Moe LaneHow did I not figure this out??
by bantamwaitCatsandbeer may have been here for less than a week, but
by bantamwaitThat's a plan right there
by E Pluribus UnumRemember, kids: Obama supporter. <NT>
by Moe LaneOh, good. I got under your skin. <NT>
by Moe Laneyou're right [Sanitized]
by catsandbeerNot "boychick:" "boychik." It's Yiddish.
by Moe LaneAnd the funny thing is
by simpson316His schedulers knew what they were doing.
by bantamwaitright
by catsandbeerOne of the very few shows that may make me regret
by simpson316He has been speaking out
by South Park Cons...Well we know that they won't bring Hammond back
by simpson316Pelosi
by Gypsy ManAn attack ad for whom?
by someone
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com




He was on Laura Ingraham a couple of months ago. She tore him a new one. It was quite amusing.
Now also found at The Minority Report