Facts from the debate last night.
By TexasJake Posted in Special Events — Comments (3) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Cut and pasted from FactCheck.org
With a nationwide wave of nominating contests looming next week, Republican presidential candidates held their last scheduled debate against the backdrop of Ronald Reagan’s retired Air Force One. But we found some of the candidates' facts just won’t fly.
Romney complained that McCain used "the wrong data" about job creation to support his assertion that Massachusetts had ranked 47th among the 50 states while Romney was governor. Romney was wrong; McCain was correct.
Romney said his hundreds of millions of dollars in "fee increases" merely caught up with years of inflation and weren’t tax increases in disguise. Independent budget experts contradict him on that.
Romney said the over-budget costs of his Massachusetts health care plan were due to changes made by his successor. Authorities on the plan say that’s mostly untrue; costs went up because more people than expected signed up for state-subsidized insurance.
Romney wrongly claimed McCain’s anti-global-warming bill would boost gasoline prices by up to 50 cents per gallon. Actually, the official estimate is 40 cents for most vehicles, and not until the year 2025.
McCain and Romney traded oversimplified assertions regarding a "timetable" for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.
Huckabee cited a Heritage Foundation study to back up his assertion that rebates to taxpayers aren’t as good a way to stimulate the economy as the highway construction he favors. In fact, the study does disparage rebates but urges tax cuts instead, not increased spending.
Ron Paul repeated his claim that defending the U.S. "empire" is costing "a trillion dollars a year." But the dubious figure includes costs such as the entire Veterans Affairs budget. Paul also claimed "nobody" is talking about cutting spending, even as his rivals did so 14 times during the same debate.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/simi_valley_showdown.html
I see that you can only link to the page and not the actual statements. Sorry about that. I withdraw my first comment then.
Absolutely incredible! And I mean that literally.
How is it possible that of the four participants, only John McCain was able to avoid making a mis-statement?
This is the one that really turned me against Romney:
"Romney wrongly claimed McCain’s anti-global-warming bill would boost gasoline prices by up to 50 cents per gallon. Actually, the official estimate is 40 cents for most vehicles, and not until the year 2025."
We all know that 40 cents is more than 50 cents.
The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
The Fannie/Freddie situation is truly outlandish...
by blackheddLOL!
by Rod PatrickI have no other words...
by tsquareNew One: Pennsylvania: Dozen
by dld1717dglenn nt
by dglennGeneration Gap (Cont'd)
by nivlemI just got a phone call from Arnold..
by speciallistThis is a very winnable race
by dld1717I didn't think a west coaster could pull it off..LOL
by speciallistGeneration gap
by nivlemThanks...
by RottDawgspeciallist
by simpson316Also bogus ...
by LeverkuhnThere never was a 15 point lead ...
by LeverkuhnAre we there yet?
by 29VictorIn a perfect world
by Chris-64Neil says, One more step to Redstate 3.0
by speciallistFnord. (n/t)
by FinrodOh believe me
by Chris-64
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



For one thing, it would have been better if you linked to the actual FactCheck.org statements instead of just referencing them. It would have made them easier to lookup and verify (or debunk) them.
Second, to me it really makes McCain worse because he wasn't quick enough mentally to point this out during the debate.
Third, although I generally like FactCheck.org, I think it does have a slight (but not overt) bias in favor of McCain. I personally take their findings with a grain of salt. However, I do not and cannot honestly dismiss them completely.
Thank you for the blog.