J'accuse

By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in | | | — Comments (2) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

In the event that we see a price hike in sugar and sugar-based products, I offer you an object of ire.

Mark Rep. Peterson well, electorally speaking. Both he and those who support his position owe you an explanation for their stance on sugar price supports. And if that explanation isn't good enough--and one suspects that it won't be--you can make sure that Rep. Peterson and his supporters will be collecting their paychecks from a source other than the United States Treasury come January 2009.

« Rethinking the Goals of a National Mortgage Bailout — Comments (45) | Reality-Based! — Comments (1) »
J'accuse 2 Comments (0 topical, 2 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
See also by Socrates

a brief but fine and insightful analysis of the protectionist Democrats' Big Sugar War on the People over at The Minority Report. OK, so maybe it's not so insightful, but it is fairly brief, anyway.

On a completely different subject, is sockpuppetry still frowned on here?

--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.

Reply To This — User Info — #1
Sock puppetry? Got a suspect? by BrianH

As far as I know it's frowned on except in the obvious spoofs like Franz or Lord Vegas.

Socialism doesn't work. It looks nice on paper, but it's been tried and it's failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

Reply To This — User Info — #2


blog advertising is good for you


Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service