McCain trails Obama in four new polls
By Fatimahbrown Posted in Archived — Comments (8) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Ok I'm nervous now.
In Rasmussen, Gallup, Bloomberg/LA Times and Diageo/Hotline--all released today, Barack Obama leads McCain by 3%, 1%, 6% and 4% respectively.
I am not concerned about Clinton at this time, as she won't be the Democratic nominee. Although it is too early, this should be reason for concern, because our nominee doesn't have the financial advantage he had in the past, and the media seems more determined than ever to elect a liberal Democrat.
Praying is all there's left.
Fear not...at least not yet. We've got a whole summer to go through before the national polls become relevant in any form.
Although Obama still has the media fawning over him, his halo has been cracked (thank to OpChaos), giving us a better chance in November. Granted, things do not look good, but don't get wobbly on us now. We need all the fighters we can get.
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Is this serious? You think four polls, all within the margin of error is a sign of impending doom? Have you checked state-by-state polls?
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
...doesn't list any kind of internal data. It talks about "registered voters", but who knows how they got their data.
Second, there were stretches in Feb and April where Obama led for 5 or 6 straight polls, in bigger margins than this.
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
At this point don't need to lose sleep over it. Senator Obama has been getting the best news since three or four weeks ago. Keep an eye on state polling and I bet that after the media hype dies down you would probaly see Senator McCain ahead or tied.
It's all going to come down to how well McCain performs on the election trail and in the debates. Any national polling right now is irrelevant.
If you check the battleground state polls on Real CLear Politics, McCain consistently beats Obama in FL and OH by several points, and is virtually tied with Obama in PA. Not to mention, Obama also loses to McCain in WV as well--and no Democratic candidate, since 1916, has won the presidency without WV. The irony in all this, though, is that Hillary beats McCain in every one of these states, but Democrats seemed determined to nominate Obama anyway. If Obama is the Democratic nominee, and that seems likely, McCain will likely be the next president due to Obama's inability to connect with Reagan Democrats and his angering of women voters.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
I appreciate it though
by Darin HNow that's a definition of genius. What an ear. n/t
by bantamwaitYes, but McCain's war, while genuinely heroic,
by bantamwaitA shorter way
by simpson316Good point, boychik!
by bantamwaitMass produced thin film
by moderichGotcha. Thanks.
by simpson316Actually, he was just lashing out.
by Moe LaneHow did I not figure this out??
by bantamwaitCatsandbeer may have been here for less than a week, but
by bantamwaitThat's a plan right there
by E Pluribus UnumRemember, kids: Obama supporter. <NT>
by Moe LaneOh, good. I got under your skin. <NT>
by Moe Laneyou're right [Sanitized]
by catsandbeerNot "boychick:" "boychik." It's Yiddish.
by Moe LaneAnd the funny thing is
by simpson316His schedulers knew what they were doing.
by bantamwaitright
by catsandbeerOne of the very few shows that may make me regret
by simpson316He has been speaking out
by South Park Cons...
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



I wouldn't be too concerned about national polls. Track the state by state polls. Those are more meaningful. They tie much closer into who will get elected. For example, Rasmussen had MO 47% to 41% for McCain. Given Missouri's history as a bell-weather state, this should be good news too.
Now also found at The Minority Report