Obama Is The Change Terrorists Have Been Waiting For
By DrJaysonFoster Posted in Archived — Comments (5) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Senator Barack Obama insists that he will not negotiate with terrorists but that he will negotiate with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. By making this spectacularly convoluted statement the senator has demonstrated that American national security is dependent upon Obama never winning the presidency.
It has been well-documented that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a terrorist. In 1979, a machine-gun toting Ahmadinejad was among those who stormed America's Tehran Embassy and took captive U.S. Diplomatic personnel:
Five former American hostages confirmed that Ahmadinejad as one of their captors. William J. Daugherty, a former intelligence officer, said he saw Ahmadinejad 8 to 10 times at the start of his captivity: “I recognized him right off. … I remember so much his hatred of Americans. It just emanated from every pore of his body.”
BBC correspondent John Simpson recalled seeing Ahmadinejad on the embassy grounds. Abholhassan Bani-Sadr, a former president of Iran long living in exile, asserted that Ahmadinejad “was among those inside the Embassy.”
http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/11/14/we-still-owe-you-one-mahmoud/
In 1982, Hezbollah claimed responsibility for murdering 241 American Marines in Beirut. The Iranian sponsor who provides weapons to the murderers of those Marines is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Today in Iraq, American soldiers are being killed by explosive devices that are supplied to the jihadists by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Yet despite Ahmadinejad's kidnapping of American diplomats and his sponsorship of those who murder American service personnel, Barack Obama indignantly declares that the Iranian president is not a terrorist. In doing so, Senator Obama has proven that he is morally unfit to be America's commander-in-chief.
I'm trying to find the specific quote where Obama said he wanted to negotiate with Iran. All I can find is where he said he wants to talk with them (in a different vein compared to our current administration I'm sure).
I'm wondering if you consider this verb 'talk' to be equivalent to negotiate, and if not, can you help me by citing where he said he wants to negotiate with Iran.
Thanks a lot!
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
"talk" = negotiate. They have been used interchangeably for quite a few years now.
Now also found at The Minority Report
the same could be said of most of the America hating liberal left. I used to believe, in my youth, that all Americans love this country but nothing could be farther from the truth. I am now convinced that no liberal, and especially Barack Obama, are fit to lead this country. It is not that they hold different views from my own it is that the views they hold betray everything that makes America great.
If you were to conspire to form a political party bent on the ruination of this country, from purposeful neglect on matters relating to national security, gutting of the military and defense budget, oppressive taxation of its citizenry, to the destruction of our economy through over-regulation by the federal government you would end up with a party exactly like today's Democrat party.