Is the Constitution Living or Dead?

By Ben Domenech

Fred Thompson's folks are sending out his hit against Mike Huckabee, who was on CNN this morning and used the phrase "living, breathing Constitution." Video here, go to about the 4 minute mark. The Fred File concedes that Huckabee wasn't talking about the interpretation of the Constitution, but rather the passage of amendments - like the Human Life Amendment, which Thompson opposes:

Now I know Governor Huckabee was talking about amending the Constitution, but I don’t think he understood that he was using code words that support judicial activism.

He does not appear to understand that reliance on the notion that the Constitution is a living, breathing document is precisely the kind of wrong-headed thinking about the Constitution that gave us Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion across our nation, and Lawrence v. Texas, which decriminalized sodomy.

Now here's the problem: just the other day in South Carolina, as Erick reported, Thompson has taken to saying:

Saying the Reagan Coalition is dead is like saying the Constitution is dead.

Well, that's a good line, but respectfully now: which is it? Is it bad to call the Constitution living, or bad to call it dead? Now I'm just confused.

For my part - as Huckabee's website indicates - my copy appears to be inanimate.

« "Just Another Ordinary Politician" WatchComments (0) | No Comment NeededComments (0) »
Is the Constitution Living or Dead?
 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service