But this strikes me as yet another round of "we are losing the message war because our message is much too subtle for the general public." Perhaps it is high time to wonder whether the message war is being lost because the ideas behind the message are not all they are cracked up to be.
I know, I know . . . this is not a revolutionary thought. But perhaps it is a timely one.
Recent comments
Nader's on CNN now, actually,
by jonlesterI was able to find the vote
by dld1717Think I meant "whither,"
by jonlesterWither the netroots now?
by jonlesterI'm sure he knew that was no time
by jonlesterTN 4th
by LoadmasterPerfectly good analogy, Vladimir.
by jonlesterThat one, he did.
by Moe LaneAny Texas posters whats
by dld1717John Kerry really thinks he
by dld1717Elliot Ness had a way of doing that <nt>
by jonlesterI am curious did Obama vote
by dld1717The NY State GOP would be
by dld1717judgments v dems, but love to destroy their own - nt
by gamecockRepublicans are stupid. They are too nice to make moral judgment
by gamecockOrion, you didn't deserve the negative comments here. you see-nt
by gamecockthanks, I needed that, and may lean on the 5's as I am oh so
by gamecockPreliminary comments relating to forensics
by jonlesterAnother first (potentially if not actually):
by jonlesterYes, the late, great Fred Gwynn. <nt>
by jonlester