China Overheats
No End In Sight
By blackhedd Posted in China | Economy | foreign exchange | inflation | Olympics | yuan — Comments (16) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Several worrisome trends in the Chinese economy that have been in place for nearly a year and a half are charging ahead with no end in sight. Here’s a news story about it.
In a word: inflation. China simply has too much money, and not enough economy. That’s putting tremendous strain on the government, which controls the economy tightly. And it’s opening up big questions about whether the country can continue its historically-unprecedented rate of change.
More…
The sheer numbers here are astounding. China now holds nearly $1.7 trillion in foreign reserves. It was only the beginning of last year that we were all remarking that they had reached a trillion.
We don’t really know how big China’s economy is. They say it’s around $3 trillion, making them the world’s fourth-largest. It’s far more likely to be around 6 or 7 trillion, making them number two. Let’s say it’s the latter. For them to be sitting on $1.7 trillion in foreign exchange would be like us holding close to $4 trillion worth of yen and euros, in cash. It’s just crazy.
Where does all of that foreign exchange come from? Well, when you and the Europeans buy stuff from China, their exporters receive dollars and euros. The People’s Bank of China (their central bank) requires all exporters to turn over their foreign-currency revenues in exchange for yuan. (Chinese people aren’t permitted to hold foreign-currency balances.)
Just as it does with oil-based economies, all of this trade-based inflow generates inflationary pressure. China exacerbates the problem by artificially undervaluing the yuan, which is allowed to change its value relative to the US dollar in tiny increments every day. This morning, the yuan is trading at just under 7 to the dollar, up from nearly 7.5 about a year ago. But the dollar has been falling against the euro, which accelerates the yuan’s undervaluation against the euro. China’s trade deficit with the Eurozone is about the size of ours. In fact, it may now be bigger.
So broad measures of inflation in China are showing prices about 8.5% higher than a year ago. Some food and grain prices are nearly 50% higher than a year ago. That’s not a typo.
What have they been doing to cool their economy down?
They raised policy interest rates half a dozen times last year. Their benchmark is a one-year rate that now stands at 7.47%. (No one has ever explained to me why China always makes their interest rates a multiple of 9 basis points. Maybe 9 is a lucky-money number.) A similar-dated US Treasury security yields a bit more than two percent. I couldn’t tell you whether the Chinese benchmark rate is actually a government-bill rate, an interbank lending rate, or a prime rate.
Still, what about raising lending rates further, as a way to reduce inflation? There are limits to that, because it tends to attract foreign capital looking for the highest yield on any given day, adjusted for exchange-rate risk.
These speculative yield-seeking inflows are called “hot money,” and they deeply frighten the Chinese. Hot money can and will change direction overnight, and an economy which comes to depend on it can crash when it decides to go somewhere else. This effect (originating in Thailand) was what caused the Asian Flu financial crisis of 1997, which devastated the economies once known as the “Four Tigers,” but barely scraped China. They still remember the lesson.
So they’ve refrained from raising rates so far this year, and they’ve slowed down the rate at which the yuan appreciates against other currencies. That leaves then with increasing bank-reserve requirements as a policy tool.
And they just raised them again, to 16.5%. (Comparable reserve requirements in the US and Europe range anywhere from 8% or less to around 10%, depending on the type of institution.) People are saying that China’s bank reserve-requirement will hit 19% by year-end. This has the effect of freezing money out of the economy, since it can’t be loaned out.
With a strategy like that, you expect that the bankers will start howling because their profits will fall. But Chinese bank profits are as strong as ever, which implies that the increased reserve-requirements aren’t really cooling the economy down.
They’re also putting money into what is probably the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund (SWF). This is a vehicle for sterilizing capital inflows by investing them in other countries under government control. To my knowledge, China’s SWF now has about $400 billion, which is about the same size as their holdings of US Treasury bonds.
China could go out and plow a trillion dollars or more into assets all around the world. But here, they would quickly run into political limits. It would be awfully hard to contain the ruckus if they suddenly start buying up public equity here in the US.
China is rapidly becoming a society full of very wealthy people. But they have an income-inequality problem that is vastly worse than the one we have. And the environmental degradation throughout the country is rapidly becoming a world-class crisis, as industrial development proceeds at all costs.
China is on an unsustainable path. Inflation simply can’t keep going at its current pace without causing some major disruptions.
The problem is that Chinese society is very fragile. Inflation is causing economic distress now, as China’s non-wealthy people find it harder and harder to buy food and fuel (prices of both are controlled, which of course results in shortages). And their attempts to cool inflation, if successful, will result in different stresses, possibly including a major spike in unemployment as investments go bad all over the country.
China’s society is controlled from the top down. They don’t have reserves of economic strength embedded at all levels of society like we do. By coming as far as they have in such a short time, they may find that an economic slump will put a lot more stress on social cohesion among their elites than they can easily handle.
On the other hand, if they don’t get a grip on inflation, they might end up with another Tiananmen Square.
-Francis Cianfrocca (“blackhedd”)
« Today is the Anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre — Comments (1) | The Obama Kowtow -- is he actually throwing the country under the bus to benefit Chicago? — Comments (17) »
China Overheats 16 Comments (0 topical, 16 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Rather amusing from the math perspective, as it's the sum of two unlucky numbers in Chinese (4 and 5... four sounds similar to "death", and five sounds similar to "not"... was actually reading something from a superstitious programmer who refuses to use the numbers 4 and 5 in his code for that reason, making an exception for the number 54, as that kinda sounds like "not die").
There are some things that could help China in the near future (I don't see the Euro staying this strong against the dollar, and a stronger dollar would greatly help China's inflation woes), but the question is whether or not it's all too little, too late...
"No matter how much lipstick you put on the taxation pig, it's still a pig... and it's currently snout-down in your wallet." - Michael Fisk
"Turn me on, dead man."
Or maybe Farrakhanic Numerology:
"When you have a 9, you have a womb that is pregnant.."
Square they can handle; the problem is what if it doesn't stop when the tanks roll into Tiananmen Square. A friend of mine is fond of noting that China needs most of its military to ensure internal stability and that therefore we don't really need to be concerned about them adventuring outside their borders. The problem with that of course is that when trouble comes, it's at least as easy to venture outside them as it is to use them inside them.
So maybe for the sake of Chinese stability the administration will finally undertake a task they should have been working on long ago for reasons of self-interest.
in Chinese cities to see groups of soldiers drilling in dress uniforms, running in fatigues or just loitering. If one didn't know better, one might mistake them for an army of occupation.
has always said that the Chinese lie about their economy (and most everything) and it is much SMALLER than they report. Who knows?
...because our government taxes it. We have a reasonable idea of what they export to us.
We know how much of our Treasury debt they own. Those data points and others give you a reasonable idea of how much they're actually producing.
They have to manage their economy such that it delivers real wealth, not just funny money, to their elites. That kind of stuff is hard to fake.
And they're scared stiff of protectionism from the Democratic Party as it completes its ascendancy to power in Washington.
All of those things are arguments that their official output statistics are understated.
I can be convinced otherwise.
So, you're telling me China's hybrid of wild-west capitalism and top-down communist control is resulting in inflation, inefficient monetary policy and regionalized food shortages?! Color me surprised. What I am more concerned about is the fact that American exporters cannot move enough product right now, due to the tight supply of container ship space in the Asian lanes. The weak dollar, combined with exploding demand in Asia for American grain, is putting an unrealized hurt on Midwestern economies that cannot move that demanded grain overseas.
Having been to China, I do think that they overstate the real size and strength of their economy. When there's no one to enforce honesty, why have it? Right?
China still has a huge problem with intellectual property protection, and unless they fix that they'll just be a place for the cheap manufacturing of low-value-add stuff.
I was in Pretoria last week, and at a meeting on Friday someone who would know mentioned that the South African state oil company Sasol absolutely refuses to have anything at all to do with China - since Sasol has a lot of intellectual property, and they don't want to share any of it with anyone in China and essentially have it pilfered and reduced to public knowledge of thusly zero value.
Interestingly, as I've mentioned before in this forum, Sasol is probably the world's leading receptacle of know-how on coal gasification - something China should be desperate to get.
They now have a functioning IP-protection judiciary system, and I'm told that more lawsuits are filed there than in the United States.
Why? Because nowadays plenty of Chinese companies are generating valuable IP that they want to protect.
Of course, this only applies to Chinese companies. They still strongly encourage the "acquisition" (Alan Greenspan's euphemism) of technology and know-how by any means possible from non-Chinese.
China's top 25% of students outnumber America's total student population. So, for every student we have, they have one to match, except theirs is an upper-percentile learner. Long-term, it will be hard to stifle that kind of ambition, creativity and success. Communism can only flourish and survive where the people are too ignorant and/or downtrodden to push for a better life. And, if as blackhedd says, China is indeed getting their IP rights in order, then I'd look for much of the value-added innovation twenty years from now to be coming from China. (Of course, all of this is predicated on the idea that the top-down command structure doesn't suffocate any burgeoning industries and resources, intellectual or otherwise.)
Maybe. Good post, BTW! Many of the poorest are in the rural areas, & China is trying to keep them out of the cities lest they have huge homeless & jobless populations. Another issue they face is an aging population.
Japan used to be the invincible leviathan, now China has taken that role. I would think that many Chinese who have become wealthy (in their terms) will chafe under despotic rule, & we could see some great flare-ups in the (perhaps) not so distant future. Capitalism & Communism tend to not co-exist well together.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
The Fannie/Freddie situation is truly outlandish...
by blackheddLOL!
by Rod PatrickI have no other words...
by tsquareNew One: Pennsylvania: Dozen
by dld1717dglenn nt
by dglennGeneration Gap (Cont'd)
by nivlemI just got a phone call from Arnold..
by speciallistThis is a very winnable race
by dld1717I didn't think a west coaster could pull it off..LOL
by speciallistGeneration gap
by nivlemThanks...
by RottDawgspeciallist
by simpson316Also bogus ...
by LeverkuhnThere never was a 15 point lead ...
by LeverkuhnAre we there yet?
by 29VictorIn a perfect world
by Chris-64Neil says, One more step to Redstate 3.0
by speciallistFnord. (n/t)
by FinrodOh believe me
by Chris-64
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com




Hey, there's got to be *some* silver lining, right?
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”