Luntz Focus Group - More Evidence Of Democrat Deserters
Let The Lefties Squirm
By California Yankee Posted in 2008 | 2008 Presidential Campaign | Democrat Deserters — Comments (12) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
As my esteemed colleague, Soren Dayton, posted earlier, this Frank Luntz focus group called the Democrats' Philadelphia debate a tie. More important, at about 3:45 into the following video, a significant number of these Democrats raised their hands, on camera, to indicate they will vote for Senator McCain in November:
The Democrats are facing a serious deserter problem. In addition to the Luntz focus group, at least at least seven recent polls show that regardless of which Democrat wins the nomination, a significant number of Democrats deserters will vote for John McCain in November.
« Did anybody... *talk* to anybody else before they decided on this Obama stadium thing? — Comments (6) | Yes Virginia, Barack Obama Does Take Money From Oil And Gas Companies — Comments (2) »
Luntz Focus Group - More Evidence Of Democrat Deserters 12 Comments (0 topical, 12 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
...but we call those ones "Canadians" now.
"No matter how much lipstick you put on the taxation pig, it's still a pig... and it's currently snout-down in your wallet." - Michael Fisk
Yep Carter even pardoned them, so that they could return to the US and become teachers.
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---
To know him is to hate him.
The more I learn about Carter, the more I realize that History has not been fair to him. In fact, he's even WORSE then most people thought he was.
"I ain't never votin' fo another Democrat so long as I can draw breath! I'll vote for a dog first!" - Leola Thomas
as though they point to a total blowout in Nov. I think pessimism and realism serve Republicans well, as optimism and self-deception tend to be the Dems' downfall. Who lives in the Echo Chamber again?
You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.
....registration advantage is due to "operation chaos", and/or Rs strategically voting in the Dem primary? I'm not saying it's not possible, I'm just curious to get a perspective from someone on the ground out there.
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
Many people claim they will vote for the other party's candidate but, voting pattern analysis shows that folks usually go with th e candidate of the party with which they self identify.
How many on the right claimed the would prefer to vote for Hillary rather than McCain? Do we hear much of that any more? Wonder why?
Because every time Clinton and Obama speak they're doing their best to ensure that this doesn't happen. That's the position I'm in. Unfortunately just about every time McCain speaks on economic issues he's doing his best to offset that.
But of course Democrats are deserting, it's because the Republicans are running a liberal/moderate candidate. Either way the country moves to the left.
....at least on fiscal issues, and especially spending.
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
In others, no, not at all. He's definitely not a small government Republican in the Reagan tradition, and you have to pretty willfully ignore a lot of evidence to think so. It's pretty obvious that his opposition to earmarks, for example, is more due to the inherently corrupting nature of them, than to being opposed to actually spending the money. I get the sense that if things were open and actually debated, he's not opposed to the projects in principle. He said this, for example.
"Transparency and knowledge are the only antidote to the corruption that is bred by earmarks, the gateway to corruption."
There are many other similar statements out there. On tax policy it's hard to argue that he's to the right of President Bush because he's been all over the place. On government regulation of business, and the creation of new government programs it's pretty easy to argue that he's to the left of President Bush.
And his adoption of the class rhetoric of the left on fiscal matters is also especially troubling. But he is who he is, and we're stuck with him. Conservative on some few issues, moderate on most, very liberal on a few. In this climate I wish we had a better candidate. But we don't.
....when few in his part did. He's got his problems, but he is more fiscally conservative than Bush.
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
but will they be able to read the ballots ? I would suggest sending in seeing eye dogs with the switchers or maybe some personable first graders to hold their hands.
They may be more trouble than they're worth but for those who don't get lost in the voting booth a thank you copy of the Collected Wisdom of Harry Reid would be a nice touch.
Oh the things you do for politics !
"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Maybe not a Typical Politician
by MikeOYou haven't made your case, I'm afraid
by civil truthObama, c'est un poseur!
by streetwiseGore does claim the earth will be destroyed if
by streetwiseI appreciate it though
by Darin HNow that's a definition of genius. What an ear. n/t
by bantamwaitYes, but McCain's war, while genuinely heroic,
by bantamwaitA shorter way
by simpson316Good point, boychik!
by bantamwaitMass produced thin film
by moderichGotcha. Thanks.
by simpson316Actually, he was just lashing out.
by Moe LaneHow did I not figure this out??
by bantamwaitCatsandbeer may have been here for less than a week, but
by bantamwaitThat's a plan right there
by E Pluribus UnumRemember, kids: Obama supporter. <NT>
by Moe LaneOh, good. I got under your skin. <NT>
by Moe Laneyou're right [Sanitized]
by catsandbeerNot "boychick:" "boychik." It's Yiddish.
by Moe LaneAnd the funny thing is
by simpson316
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Or was that just in the early 70s?