THE 4TH OF JULY IN SAMARRA, IRAQ


Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.

Meet Mark Sanford

Mr. Right?

By Dan McLaughlin Posted in | | | | Comments (15) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Along with Tim Pawlenty, the first subject of this sporadic series of video clips (mostly from YouTube) of potential national GOP candidates (whether for the Vice Presidency in 2008 or the big job later), the other candidate on everyone's short list is South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford. Sanford is regarded as a rock-solid conservative (a somewhat tongue-in-cheek self-described "right wing nut," even), like McCain he has made a name as an anti-pork crusader, and he has a great resume - six years in Congress, six as a Governor - giving him far more experience at the same age than the likely Democratic presidential nominee.

So how does Sanford play on the small screen?

Read On...

Here is a somewhat choppy clip with Gov. Sanford talking to Tucker Carlson about the GOP's loss of direction on domestic spending since 1994:


Here's a lengthy interview with Carolina Business Review, discussing everything from local tragedies to executive accountability to education reform (school choice) to immigration to Sanford's prickly relationship with South Carolina legislators even in his own party - I love the line about how voters wonder why government should be growing faster than their own paycheck:

Here is Gov. Sanford talking about the value of taking losses, both at war and in domestic politics, to advance a cause:


Here is Sanford practicing the venerable art of not answering a question, in this case his position on "Z Visas" in the immigration bill in mid-2007:


Here's a joint appearance with Jim DeMint on rates of spending, economic growth, earmarks (Sanford leads off the first clip and comes on at 2:44 of the second clip), and the connection between spending and corruption:



Here he discusses a $50 million land conservation initiative (the second half of the video is other people talking):


Here he is discussing his business-competitiveness agenda in a low-key talk with a newspaper editorial board in South Carolina, including laying out how he expanded the governor's role in the annual budget process:


Here is a long and rambling endorsement speech for a candidate for state treasurer:


CONCLUSION: Sanford is smart and detail-oriented, and comes off as a solid, common-sense grownup in the Dick Cheney rhetorical style, but without the snarl. But he's also rather dry and a little slow-talking in a laconic Southern way, a style that may not appeal to everyone. He'll never be accused of upstaging the boss, but also never make anyone worry about his readiness for the big job.

« The Bloom Is Off The RoseComments (0) | Obama Overtakes Hillary In TexasComments (47) »
Meet Mark Sanford 15 Comments (0 topical, 15 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

I had the honor of being able to vote for him during his first run for Congress. One of his platforms was term limits, you know, when everyone in America was sick of their government. He promised that he would only serve for three terms, and after three terms, he didn't run again! I'm quite sure that was quite the boon to his candidacy for Governor, but I no longer lived in SC at that time.

Of all the SC politicians that I've met, I wish I could have met him more than the rest of them. Maybe one day....

Long ago, before his name even came up, I thought that he would make an excellent VP pick. I'm glad he's being "seriously" considered.

I personally think Mark Sanford would be the perfect choice as John McCain's VP. Sanford is a "full spectrum" conservative who does have a maverick streak; in Sanford's case, that maverick streak is fighting Republicans in his own state legislature over spending. I give him extra, extra kudos for that.

The one possible problem that I can think of against Sanford is the issue of the Confederate flag in South Carolina. Unfortunately, a lot of cycles in this elections would be taken up about that. I had not thought of that as a problem but previously, when I mentioned Sanford as a possible VP pick for McCain, someone else here at RedState brought it up.

However, I am an African-American South Carolinian who hates the Confederate flag and all that it stands for and I have no problem with Mark Sanford. Yet even I really don't see that as a problem for Sanford.

Again, Mark Sanford is my first choice!

Mark Sanford by nighthawk

I am a South Carolinian and a Sanford supporter. He is a good man who doesn't mind rubbing some people the wrong way. He is a true conservative.
That said, I don't think that he has a chance of being picked as a VP nominee, as McCain will carry S.C. with no problem.

He's a likable guy who mixes Newt Gingrich (policy wonk) and Dick Cheney (partisan). That's a pretty good mix for a VP choice and it should please all parts of the Party. It plays up McCain's strength (reformer, anti-pork) while making other wings feel they get a spot of the table (immigration hawks, socons).

______________________________________
Donate to the Rs in Close Senate Races through Slatecard

Sarah Palin isn't bad either by ConservativePartyNow

She may be the Veep and she has openly admitted she is interested

for where she said she was interested?

"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill

You guys don't know him... by Billy Chappell

As as fiscal conservative he is ok. But on social issues he is more left of center. As Governor he has accomplished almost nothing. The state has 3rd in job loss in the country and 47th in job creation while he has been Governor. And worst of all...he doesn't play well with others! Very few if any of the Republican leaders in the state will back him. I am from his state...I know.

And for that matter, so is nighthawk and we both think mark Sanford would be a great VP choice for McCain.

i am curious as to why you think "on social issues he is more left of center" when he (1) opposed to abortion, voting to ban partial birth abortions and transporting underage girls to areas allowing abortions without parental consent and (2) opposes gay marriage, civil unions and adoption. Truthfully, I think the charge that Sanford is "more left of center" on social issues is laughable.

Yes, you're right that he has gotten into with state Republicans but that is because he vetoed the pork projects of state Republicans in the state. Personally, I think that is a very good thing.

Like I wrote before, Mark Sanford is my first choice for McCain's VP. On that, I think I am not alone on RedState.

of Mark Sanford in general. In particular, I thought his editorial in regards to Obama and the history of race in SC was appropriate.

However, I think that there are two reasons why I would prefer someone else:

1) There are only eight weeks from the convention to election day. He would spend half of that time explaining the confederate flag and SC. He would also have to take some time out to explain why he couldn't vote for his own re-election - not a big issue, but not the distraction that you would want in such a short cycle.

2) In order to win this cycle, we will need to keep working class men, and/or suburban women who voted for Bush in '00 and '04, but who now are focused on the economy, and considering "change". To be honest, these are the folks who should be died in the wool Republicans (our pro family, pro school choice, lower tax, message), but we have trouble relating to them. Due to the disparity of party registration, and the enthusiasm of the Dems, we can not win in this cycle without making serious inroads here. I honestly feel we need a nominee that can say "I am a working mother from a blue collar family, and I know what you are going through. I know what it is like to pass up a vacation, or to budget for family meals. I know what the difference a tax cut vs. a tax hike can make." In this cycle, that person is Sarah Palin (and do not try Blackburn - she is one of the most affluent mambers of the house, from one of the most affluent districts in her state.)

Suburban women by reldim

I don't know that McCain is having any trouble there by himself. The recent Siena poll here in NY shows McCain with about a 20 point edge in the suburbs over both Obama and Clinton, pulling about 55%. I grew up in the NY suburbs (Long Island) and have family there, and I know that you're not going to get to 55% support in a poll just based on men. Given the nature of the NY suburbs, my guess is that if you took similar polls in the Philly, Pittsburgh and even many DC suburbs, you'd find similar results - strong showings by McCain (and since Democrats probably need to run up the score in the suburbs in places like PA and VA to win those states that will be good even if McCain "loses" those locations).

Palin would probably be good, but we would spend 4 weeks trying to remind people that talking about "experience" in reference to Obama is different then talking about it with the VP. Since we know very well that age will be an issue, how can we credibly attack experience when we put someone who has less experience than Obama that close to being in charge? I'm not sure she's ready or that this is her cycle.

Unless you're arguing that Sanford would actually serve to actively turn suburban voters againstMcCain, your second point seems to be unsupported.

...landside.

However, I think there is a hole in your math and logic.

The key areas for this race will be (in my opinion) Ohio, Minnesota, Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin. And in these areas there is a lot of concern about the economy (and I am not talking about families with household incomes above $100,000.00 per year). And considering what the vote will probably be in the major metropolitan areas - especially if Obama is the candidate - we will have to do much better than 55% in the suburbs.

We will need to be close to 65%-35% in the suburbs to win this thing. So if McCain is at 55% right now, how does Sanford help him get the extra 10%?

In regards to experience, I do not think that will be a big factor for a VP like it is for the top of the ticket (and the Dems will have to be careful about any attacks on a sitting woman governor, just like we have to be careful in discussing a sitting african-american senator), and she can always flip it by bringing up her real life experience managing kitchen table issues. Lets be honest, Obama is likely to be at the top of the ticket (Harvard educated lawyer), and he is likely to balance himself by picking one of the Democratic old guard, and not the liberal wing of the party.

If we run Palin, they will risk looking patronizing on economic issues (can you imagine Obama and Kerry trying to argue with the wife of an oil driller and fisherman about the real life effect of tax cuts, or school choice to a hockey mom).

By the way, watching the debate - Obama just said he would re-invade Iraq if we left and Al-Queda started to base there.

Due to the likely makeup of the Democratic ticket, we will have a unique opportunity to undercut them on these kitchen table issues, but a guy like Sanford, who grew up somewhat affluent, and has a MBA, is not going to relate as well (the guy who fires you, as opposed the guy you have beer with). Now, if we needed the CFO vote, he would - with Cox - be the guy.

Again, I admire Sanford, but not for this position in this dynamic.

I'm also from South Carolina and consider our state fortunate to have a guy like Mark Sanford as our governor. He is the taxpayer's hero and a true conservative leader.

While our Republican-dominated state Legislature has completely abandoned any pretense of fiscal conservatism, Mark Sanford has almost singularly shined the light of day on the Legislature's recalcitrance and, in my view, outright corruption. Governor Sanford is despised by Democrat and Republican legislators alike in our state - many of whom freely expressed open contempt for him and his ideas after his most recent State of the state speech.

Governor Sanford's annual vetoes of pork-laden, fiscally irresponsible budgets have been routinely overridden - almost unanimously by the Legislature. The fact that he is not popular with our state Legislature is a very good thing. He is, however, very popular with the people of South Carolina who re-elected him with 55% of the vote during the 2006 election cycle that was otherwise a disaster for Republicans on a national basis.

While I think that putting Mark Sanford on the ticket would help McCain win back the conservative base, I do wonder whether Mark is ready for prime-time. He is a very good man but may be a little too folksy for some.

I don't know how Sanford would do campaigning to be the POTUS (in 2012 or 2016), and I don't even know if he would want it. Note that this is different from saying that I don't think he could do it. I'm sure he's qualified and talented enough.

I personally believe that McCain won't have a second term, so it's up to him to give us a VP that can carry the torch. Thanks to W, we don't have a current VP that can do that.

Do any of y'all think Sanford would fit the bill? Could you really say "President Mark Sanford?"

Ohio could be key by houstonrepublican

McCain is way up in Florida (Obama has no chance there with pushing for kissing Castro butt and being violenty anti Israel) or I'd be for considering Crist. I think Pawlenty could be good an bring in his state and another state or 2 in that area. How about someone from Ohio which could be close?

"Government is too big and spends too much." Ronald Reagan


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service