A Few Obvious Points About Cuba
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Cuba | Fidel Castro | Foreign Affairs | Incompetent Leadership — Comments (13) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
And yes, it is amazing that we actually have to remind people of this:
In 1958, the year before Fidel Castro came to power in a revolution and promised prosperity, democracy and the restoration of Cuba's 1940 constitution, the Caribbean island, while troubled by poverty, a corrupt dictator and the American Mafia, was also better off than most developing nations.
While poor compared to the United States, Cuba in 1958 had a per capita GDP of $3,170 according to the OECD. (Canada's was $8,947.). But Cuba outranked all other Latin American countries except four: Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Venezuela.
Tellingly, in 1958, the island nation's per person wealth was higher than any East Asian country or colony, save Japan, which barely beat Cuba at only $3,290. Hong Kong had a per capita GDP of $2,924, Singapore's was $2,294, the Philippines' was $1,447, Taiwan's per person GDP stood at $1,387 and South Korea's was $1,112.
Thus in 1958, Cuba was almost as rich as Japan, one and half times as wealthy as Singapore, richer than Hong Kong, and three times as prosperous as South Korea.
Fifty years later, Cuba is one of the poorest countries in Latin America.
Read on . . .
Meanwhile, jurisdictions such as Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan (the latter two also had dictators and problems similar to Cuba in the 1950s) have long eclipsed Cuba. They've done so not only in per capita wealth, but in measurements Castro's defenders point to when they assert the Marxist revolution "worked," such as in health care and education
The irony of Cuba's position became even more evident recently.
By happenstance, I was in Cuba when Castro resigned. It should have happened long ago and I doubt his replacement, his brother Raul, will change much.
Human Rights Watch puts it this way: "The repressive machinery (Castro) constructed over almost half a century remains fully intact."
That machinery, documented extensively by a plethora of sources in the decades since 1959, includes secret police, plenty of snitches, summary executions, concentration camps, sadism against male and female inmates alike, "re-education" and forced labour. One refugee I spoke with last year told me how his father was sent away for three years to work in the sugarcane fields after the family applied to leave Cuba in 1969.
The abuse of Cubans continues even recently. In 2003, the Cuban government gave 75 journalists jail terms of 20 years and more for expressing something other than the state line.
The article goes on to argue for an end to the U.S. trade embargo. This may be a good idea, but it is worth noting anew that the dearth of trade from one country--even one as powerful as the United States--is not enough to explain Cuba's economic woes.
For that explanation, you ought to contact the Castro brothers and their enablers.
« I Have Found Sisyphus — Comments (1) | Meet The New Boss — Comments (0) »
A Few Obvious Points About Cuba 13 Comments (0 topical, 13 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Well,it may be a squalid cesspool economically....but it's a 'workers paradise'...just ask Danny Glover and all his megabucks Hollywood suckass lefty pals
The Left doesn't mind misery or squalor--if they perceive it as equally shared.
For them, it's better to live in a country without modern automobiles, with an extremely low standard of living, without any significant economic growth whatsoever--just so long as whatever rations do exist are distributed fairly.
What they despise most is inequality of wealth in a society like the United States--even if the poor in that country fare better than most people anywhere else on earth.
As Howard Zinn himself admitted, Communism lost its meme of "inevitability" after the Soviet bloc collapsed. But to Marxists like him, Marxism is still the preferable moral choice.
Reducing the issue of Marxism vs. capitalism to one of preferred moral code, makes it extremely unlikely that they can ever be dissuaded otherwise. Convincing someone to change their basic moral code is extremely difficult. It's like trying to argue someone out of their religious beliefs.
caviar source or at least organic lettuce.
Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer columns
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
its an important distinction. if the wealth in 1958 was heavily skewed it would present a different picture of Cuba's trajectory.
you cannot SERIOUSLY be suggesting that the Cuban people might be better off today under Castro then they were in 1958, because they are ALL EQUALLY POOR.
Only a devout Communist could look at Cuba today and believe that it is better off today because they have equality. Well, the people are equal -- but the government is MORE equal.
===
This post has been brought to by Thorazyne and other psychotropic drugs -- better living through chemistry
I'm not suggesting anything. I believe Cuba would be much better off with a free market system and democratic governance. My point is that if this data is the "mean" it would does not give this hyposthesis the same strength that the "median" would.
but I await with baited breath the numbers re mean and median to conclude whether cubans are poor.
Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer columns
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
hopefully with the Castro twins dead and gone, the Cuban people will become instantly wealthy selling Classic Cars to American Yuppies!
===
This post has been brought to by Thorazyne and other psychotropic drugs -- better living through chemistry
I can appreciate that.
Look, the author of this piece and I probably share the same bias towards the free market, rule of law, and democracy. Most of the readers of this site probably share those biases as well. Being aware of that bias makes it all the more important that in forming our conclusions we use data that is not biased.
If a reader that didnt share our ideological perspective were to read this piece they would wonder why biased data was used, and it would undermine the strength of the argument.
Perhaps within our community here it doesnt matter, but its a pet peeve of mine.
Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer columns
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Numbers would be more useful than mean (average), especially in arguments with those concerned about "equality," I'm not sure it makes much difference in this case.
In '58, all Latin American countries had their share of subsistance farmers. Cuba, in addition, had three industries (tobacco, sugar/rum, and tourist) that were labor-intensive and bound to increase the median, as well as mean, incomes.
The "cruel dictator" argument was standard fare for leftists at the time (actually from the Tzar to the Shah) who wished to impose a government that turned out to be more cruel and more dictatorial.

Copying their health care system is such a great idea.