Happy Rights For Illegal Aliens Day
By California Yankee Posted in I | Immigration — Comments (22) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
As you are sure to recall, two years ago, hundreds of thousands marched in support of rights for illegal aliens in coordinated events across the U.S.
Today, as they plan to march again, the rights for illegal aliens movement appears to have lost its enthusiasm:
Now, as they prepare for another round of May Day demonstrations in support of more liberal laws, some Austin organizers say fear and fatigue have sapped some of the marches' vigor.
"When year after year you fight and you fight without any kind of real attention and concern by our legislators, it's only logical that people might wear themselves out and maybe get discouraged from coming out again," said Luissana SantibaƱez of Familias Unidas por la Esperanza (Families United for Hope).
"The enthusiasm has diminished," said Josefina Castillo of the American Friends Service Committee.
[. . .]
Declining participation in the marches may also be due to a feeling among immigrants that the demonstrations haven't accomplished much and that they are powerless to make a difference, organizer Antolin Aguirre said.
Read on.
According to the Austin American-Statesman, organizers are plan rallies and marches in downtown Austin:
Protesters plan to walk past the jail during the march, which starts at 5:30 at the Capitol and ends with a rally at Austin City Hall.
Thousands marched last year, though fewer than in 2006, when police estimated that 8,500 people protested in Austin. (Organizers said the turnout was closer to 40,000.)
In Chicago, up to 50,000 are expected at a downtown march and rally. "Activists" hope to revive the stagnant immigration debate, in time for the presidential election, demanding comprehensive immigration legislation - including pathways to citizenship for the 12 million illegal immigrants estimated to be living in the U.S.:
Organizers say they have extended their message to include unity among different races and, for the first time, gay rights activists. Representatives from the Rev. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s Rainbow/PUSH Coalition and the Nation of Islam are expected to attend events Thursday.
[. . .]
Organizers say this year's efforts are focused less on protests and more on voter registration and setting an agenda for the next president.
Seattle, where organizers are preparing for a ninth annual march, they complain about enforcement.
All and all, the news is now better for those who wish to stop, or at least slow, the flood of illegal immigration:
* The border fence is being constructed.
* Enforcement is improving, both nationally and at the state level, as is evidenced by the protest organizers' complaints and plans to march past the jail, as well as complaints from businesses.
* The Border Patrol is continuing to expand, more resources to prosecute illegals have also been made available.
I realize that immigrants are an extremely vital element of our economy. Nevertheless, the only way I can see to stem the endless stream of illegal aliens is to establish a guest worker program that doesn't reward those who came into the U.S. illegally, punish those that hire illegal aliens, and make a serious effort to control the border.
I supported the Senate's 2006 compromise on immigration reform, which the Democrats scuttled. My main objection to other "comprehensive reform" proposals that give legal status to illegal aliens is those proposals would encourage more illegal immigration, as did the amnesty authorized by the 1986 Immigration Reform Act.
Allowing those that disregard the nation's immigration laws to remain here and pursue citizenship sends a simple message - get into the United States anyway you can because eventually, you will be legalized.
I commend President Bush and Senator McCain for their willingness to try and reform immigration. True reform might well include some path to citizenship, but it must be seen to discourage the flood tide of illegals constantly crossing the border.
Happy Rights For Illegal Aliens Day 22 Comments (0 topical, 22 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
...based on this topic that RedStaters seem least able to have a civil discussion about.
Let's make a drinking game out of this thread...you take a shot everytime a comment mentions "amnesty."
If we did that, all of Red State would have alcohol poisoning.
"I ain't never votin' fo another Democrat so long as I can draw breath! I'll vote for a dog first!" - Leola Thomas
Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---
...they're not even bothering to close off any roads. Anybody who's familiar with downtown Austin knows that that means it's going to be a tiny affair, as anything larger than a small family gathering would make the city pretty much impassable.
The western half of the US is in many practical ways the Aztlan they want. We have water stations for illegals undocumenteds crossing the border. We have a DHS that seems to do its very best to thwart efforts to build a fence. We have bilingual signage in almost every public place I'm aware of - except for those places that have signage exclusively in Espanol. Free medical care. Freedom from those pseky regulations about having auto insurance.
And yet, the rallies are losing momentum.....
Bummer.
Kill the terrorists
Protect the borders
Punch the hippies -- Frank J
I think the marches were great. They woke up the American people and galvanized them into action to stop the shamnesty (double shot). I wish there was some place where I could donate some really large Mexican flags to the marchers because they were particularly helpful.
I disagree that immigration reform needs to include a path to citizenship. I think the argument that we can't deport millions of people so we have to give them a path to citizenship aka amnesty is a false choice. I can see at least two other choices and I like both of them better.
The first is my preferred choice which is attrition through enforcement. Steadily and aggressively enforce our laws against employers. I don't think it is even necessary to arrest the illegals when we raid a workplace. That just gives the MSM a bunch of sob stories. Just arrest the employers and let the illegals know that their job has been terminated. They will eventually go home for the same reason they came: to have a better life. We are seeing this approach work everywhere it is tried. There is lots of evidence coming out of Arizona, Oklahoma and Prince Williams Virginia. Finally we have a solution that works! Lets take it nation wide!
The second is to ignore them which is essentially what we are doing now. They are a lot cheaper as illegals then they would be as citizens and it is way easier to dispose of the trouble makers. Their children will eventually be part of our society. I see no reason to give the voting franchise to people who don't respect our laws and I see no benefit in bringing them out of the shadows. (As if they were hiding! They clearly are not in the shadows today.)
I'll be against any reform that is not enforcement oriented until I see a willingness to enforce the laws we already have. Things have gotten slightly better in the last year but we have a long ways to go and at least one more Presidential Administration before there is a consistent believable pattern of enforcement.
For the record, I have read this post twice and I don't believe there is anything uncivil about it. But by my count, it calls for three shots and given the topic I believe Tequila is the appropriate poison.
I don't think anyone has the foresight to believe that for any of the proposed solutions to succeed that they must exclude all others. No matter how you slice it, this issue has current as well as future problems. I don't think killing incentive to hire illegals alone is enough to deal with the current number of illegal aliens present in the country right now. A guest worker program or path to citizenship may not be what we all want in our vacuum worlds, but I have yet to see a more practical way of dealing with millions of people that we can't ignore and can't deport.
I also do not think that killing the incentive to hire illegal immigrants is enough to kill THEIR incentive to come here in the future. The excessive red tape and amount of time taken by the INS to issue decisions to applicants is currently unreasonable. We need to create or expediate an immigration processing system where applicants can get a decision in a few weeks or months instead of 5+ years. Be honest; if you had to wait five years for a new life, you might just consider cutting a few corners too. Get rid of the incentive on multiple fronts and THEN we can talk about efficient enforcement of existing laws and regulations without (or at least less of) a material burden on the government.
All in all, preventative measures dealing with FUTURE illegal immigration have be a little more thoughtful in design than a larger fence, which will help us in dealing with CURRENT illegal immigrants.
I think ignoring them is a much better idea then giving them a path to citizenship.
As illegals the cost us about $10 billion per year at the Federal Level, net of the trivial taxes they pay. If we make them legal they will pay slightly more taxes but be eleigible for the full buffet of social services. The cost will climb to $30 billion per year net of their trivial taxes.
What is the benefit of making them legal?
Even better than ignoring them though is trying to force them to leave which seems to work everywhere it has been tried.

"I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
1. If you are here illegally, go back to your country of origin.
2. Once home, go to the US Embassy and apply for a permanent resident visa.
3. When your PRV is issued, come to the US.
4. After the appropriate length of time (time spent here illegally does not count), apply for citizenship.
____

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
That PRV can take up to 5 years. Do you think that promotes a culture of law abidance?
A "culture of law abidance" can only be created by a very explicit and simple (not complex) system of laws that is coupled with vigorous enforcement of those laws. Both complexity in the legal system and inconsistent enforcement of laws incentivise lawbreaking.
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---
I don't have the same confidence in the "rigorous enforcement" as you do. Sure, we need it but not by itself. I also view this in terms of risk. The investigation into the Enron fraud made us all aware that there were many risk factors present before the fraud was actually committed. Perhaps, if those risks were mitigated earlier, we wouldn't have seen the catastrophe that resulted. I'm suggesting that we could reduce one risk factor related to the incentives driving the act of jumping the border illegally: the risk that having a red tape and time-consuming immigration process encourages applicants to bypass it rather than go through it legally. Just as in the case of Enron, having a pervasive opportunity, incentive, and attitude to do something wrong doesn't excuse the act itself. But we ought to be smart enough to see risks and do something about them rather than just treating symptoms of these risks after-the-fact. Should we ignore the rigorous enforcement part of the solution? No, of course not. But no one is ever going to convince me that our current processing system is just peachy or not, at least in part, a contributing factor to our problem.
Not rigorous enforcement. Meant to say vigorous as you did. Guess I'm getting dyslexic. :)
You seem to be working from the premise that these people should be allowed to come. I disagree. They are overwhelmingly uneducated. Something like 75% of illegal aliens lack a highschool education and almost 50% of them are illiterate in their own language. They have very little to offer either our society or our economy. The only thing they can do is work at the low skill jobs and they essentially cut the legs out from under our own poorest citizens. They represent cheap labor for business and are essentially a subsidy. For everybody else they are a burden. Poor people get less opportunity and lower wages. And the middleclass gets taxed to support them. I would be happier if the PRV took 100 years. I have been being taxed to fight the war on poverty for 35 years and I just don't see any need to import more poverty.

"I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
And that comment #15 was meant as a response to #13. I failed to hit the reply button.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2008/04/21/report_unc...
"The bottom line, which you need to know for your own bottom line, is that U.S. taxpayers are giving more than $9,000 a year in cash or benefits to each immigrant, a third of whom are in the country illegally. That's $36,000 for each immigrant household of four."
While the GOP is better on this issue than the Dems, you would think that the party of low taxes and fiscal responsibility would see this as no-brainer. It shows you just how powerful the business and special interest lobbies are. They get what they want and the taxpayers get the shaft.
$9K/year/illegal immigrant. Wow! What a benefit! Let's legalize them all and get 50 million more!
Thank goodness for people like Jim DeMint and Jeff Sessions. They have their fingers in the hole as the dam is about to burst.
One of the major sticking points of the illegal-immigrant debate is what to do with the 12-million who are already here. But with rigorous border enforcement, that problem takes care of itself in about a generation. We just need to be a bit patient. I suggest that raids and deportation at the employment sites, coupled with some nationally applied 'we are not joking around anymore' disincentives to the employers will actually start something of a backflow.
I would also like to see Section 1 the XIVth Amendment amended to require that at least one parent of a naturally born person must be a United States citizen before United States citizenship is conferred.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
Obama's Feeding Nader Material
by buckeyeAs some of my more hip
by porterjervisDitto me
by aceintxMakes me think of this boy's peers
by jonlesterI agree gamecock. It isn't a puff piece
by pilgrimNader's on CNN now, actually,
by jonlesterI was able to find the vote
by dld1717Think I meant "whither,"
by jonlesterWither the netroots now?
by jonlesterI'm sure he knew that was no time
by jonlesterTN 4th
by LoadmasterPerfectly good analogy, Vladimir.
by jonlesterThat one, he did.
by Moe LaneAny Texas posters whats
by dld1717John Kerry really thinks he
by dld1717Elliot Ness had a way of doing that <nt>
by jonlesterI am curious did Obama vote
by dld1717The NY State GOP would be
by dld1717
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



you could get those same quotes from supporters of tighter border control.
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill