Liberals Look Like Losers in Voter ID Case

Anti-ID advocates embarrassed by one of their own

By Bluey Posted in | | | Comments (23) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Yesterday's arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court case on an Indiana voter ID law couldn't have gone much worse for liberals who want to overturn the state's statute targeting vote fraud. Justices appeared inclined to reject arguments from the Indiana Democratic Party and ACLU and uphold two lower-court decisions favoring the Indiana law.

The court's swing vote, Justice Anthony Kennedy, dampened the left's hopes when he expressed skepticism about the requirements of the law. In questioning the lawyer for the state Democratic Party and ACLU, Kennedy asked, "You want us to invalidate a statute on the ground that it's a minor inconvenience to a small percentage of voters?" At a time when Americans are asked to show photo ID for routine things such as buying alcohol or getting on an airplane, it hardly seems unreasonable to do the same before voting.

But perhaps the best moment of the hour-long hearing came when Justice John Paul Stevens asked U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement whether Democrats were adversely impacted more than Republicans because of the state's photo ID requirement. Clement, who supports the Indiana law, shot back that that if "this was a cleverly designed mechanism by the Republican Party to disadvantage the Democratic Party, at least in 2006 it looks like it went pretty far awry."

Already facing an uphill battle in the courts, liberals were done in by one of their own yesterday when a woman cited by critics of the law was discovered to be a fraud herself. A story from KPC News added to an already lengthy list yet another example of how liberals cheat through the use of vote fraud.

Continued on the jump ...

On the eve of a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Indiana Voter ID law has become a story with a twist: One of the individuals used by opponents to the law as an example of how the law hurts older Hoosiers is registered to vote in two states.

Faye Buis-Ewing, 72, who has been telling the media she is a 50-year resident of Indiana, at one point in the past few years also claimed two states as her primary residence and received a homestead exemption on her property taxes in both states.

The article illustrates why this case is quite possibly the most important on the Supreme Court's docket this term. Not only are people like Faye Buis-Ewing gaming the system, but law-abiding voters are also being disenfranchised through fraudulent acts such as voting by dogs and the deceased.

To bolster the arguments of voter ID advocates, Project 21 released a friend-of-the-court brief featuring the results of the first survey of voter turnout in Indiana since the implementation of the state's voter ID requirements. The survey by University of Missouri professor Jeffrey Milyo found that Indiana’s voter ID law did not suppress voter turnout.

Similar studies, such as this one from The Heritage Foundation and another from the University of Delaware and University of Nebraska, have reached the same conclusion.

If the United States is to set an example for the rest of the world, we must maintain the integrity of our electoral process. This case should be a slam dunk for the Supreme Court.

« McCain: Obama would nominate bad justices.Comments (4) | Mr. Justice Clinton? Don't Bet On ItComments (17) »
Liberals Look Like Losers in Voter ID Case 23 Comments (0 topical, 23 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

This is an issue that we should not fear pushing, and pushing hard. According to Rasmussen, a photo id for voting gets overwhelming approval, 80-13. The more we push on this, the more Democrats have to dance around the facts.

---
Finrod's First Law of Bandwidth:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it takes the bandwidth of ten thousand.

Bush League by Adgedomin

I hate that republicans have this image of being dirty politicians. At least we don't cheat to win. I'm tired of liberals saying that republicans don't do anything to help the people. How does voting twice or having the dead vote for you help the little people?

...do the work for the little people. You see, a population often doesn't know what is good for itself - it needs wise liberal overlords. So, if you cheat a bit to get yourself into office, it's really just for the good of those poor, ignorant people who don't know enough to realize that they need you in office to benefit them. So, you see, it's all about helping the people who are too ignorant to know they need your help.

It makes soooo much sense now. I do need a liberal overlord to spend all my money for me.

....to point you to the "Reply to This" link when replying to comments. :-)

They upheld the voter ID act in Arizona last year.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Was it en banc? by Neil Stevens

With as many judges as there are in the 9th, you can get any outcome you want by picking three at random.

HTML Help for Red Staters

Unfortunately a win in the Supreme Court which I encourage will only force the democraps to push for drivers licenses as a right for invaders - they need the motor voters to replace the more traditional methods of stuffing the ballot box.

...that is a losing issue for them (something like 70% opposed it in liberal New York).

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

Georgia voter ID law by Charging Piper

Good post. Thanks for the update.

I love the fact that the Dems poster lady was registered to vote in two states. That is just so drippingly classic!

So can anyone who is familiar with this issue elaborate on how a correct SCOTUS decision later this spring (which seems likely) will impact the Georiga voter ID law?

At the same time she was campaigning for higher taxes, no doubt. Wonder how many property tax levies she campaigned for and voted for knowing she could just scam her way out of paying most of it by claiming two primary residences.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

they'll be going after this woman for back taxes, because she fairly clearly fraudulently obtained a homestead exemption.

If this happens we'll probably see articles decrying the despicable attacks of the government on the elderly, and it's all the Republicans fault.

In Daviess County Kentucky, the Court Clerk creates a roster of registered voters and sends to my precinct. When I go to my precinct, I sign under my printed name on that list. If my name isn’t on that list, I don’t get to vote and if someone has already signed, that vote would be contested as well as investigated. I find it hard to believe that someone would dumpster dive for my phone/electrical bills to use as my ID for one vote. To my knowledge, need for such investigations (much like the rest of the country I understand) are pretty much nonexistent.

I can well understand that liberals will lose this round as it’s only common sense that everyone should have identification for something as important as voting, particularly for the President of the United States. In reality, it’s only good business. In the end however, it will I can only see that it will suppress probable Democratic voters (the very poor, elderly, uneducated, etc.) and solve a nonexistent problem.

It won't suppress squat by Neil Stevens

I haven't heard of picture ID requirements suppressing, oh, cigarette or alcohol use. Come on. Don't parrot their lines that aren't based in fact and reason.

HTML Help for Red Staters

I was told recently that prison release papers are acceptable as tobacco, and alcohol ID, even though they do not include photos. I wonder if prison release papers can be used at the voting both.

...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...

---Thomas Paine---

as long as they're not felony release papers of course the dems probably want felons to be able to vote also.

1 Is there a voter fraud issue that this will correct?
2 Will this create a "poll tax" for anyone?

1. YES. See:

among others.

2. NO. A poll tax is an undue burden placed upon voters deliberately intended to stop certain people WHO ARE LEGALLY ALLOWED TO VOTE from not voting. The burden that voter ID laws create - to present valid ID - can hardly be construed as "undue".

In your example by skey

...who is responsible for purging the list of people who have moved? Of people who have died? How good is the check when someone registers to begin with to ensure that they're a not only eligible to vote, but an actual real person?

In most jurisdictions the answer would be Nobody, probably nobody, and not very good.

When I go to my precinct, I sign under my printed name on that list.

to here

I find it hard to believe that someone would dumpster dive for my phone/electrical bills to use as my ID for one vote.

What does a utility bill have to being able to sign your name?

Now if you are talking about registration, it's pretty easy to get utility bills. You can easily make as many as you want yourself. Or if you really want someone else's legitimate bill, you can simply steal them from mailboxes. A bill from a given utility will be in lots of people's mailboxes on the same day. The criminals can drive down a street on that day and collect 50 of them. There is no need to look through any trash. Anyway, the big problem is a utility bill does NOT say whether you are eligible to vote. Aliens (legal and illegal) have utilities. Those bills also do NOT tell anybody whether you are the person whose name is on the bill.

In this state you don't even need a utility bill to register. You can just have someone vouch for you. That's even worse. And of course, once you are on the rolls you can vote in every election from then on out just by signing your name.

To my knowledge, need for such investigations (much like the rest of the country I understand) are pretty much nonexistent.

Because we don't care about enforcing the law. Only the most obvious cases of organized voter fraud are ever investigated, and even there they are usually just dropped or the perpetrator gets off with a slap on the wrist. We had a strip club owner here who lived in a small town and he more than doubled the population of the town with fraudulent registrations from his dancers and customers. Then he filled out and sent in absentee ballots for them. He got busted, because he was a total moron and his fraud was impossible to miss. I don't think he got any prison time. I know the dancers and customers who participated got no punishment at all. If he wasn't so clueless he would have gotten away with it.

I can only see that it will suppress probable Democratic voters

You need some kind of ID to participate in society. You can't even cash a government check without some kind of ID. The vast majority of people have these IDs. If they don't have them, they can easily get them. I don't see the problem.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

If a favored group is adversely impacted what else is there to do but ignore the law, a minimal requirement, honest voting, and follow your emotions to debase the election process?

Ironic that the opponents of the law bring forward a liar and a fraud to help their case. No, not Stevens who is dependable and a regular in that regard, but the woman with two addresses and two names. Ironic, typical, stupid, and fitting.

"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service