Price Supports
Posted at 12:54am on May 6, 2008 J'accuse
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
In the event that we see a price hike in sugar and sugar-based products, I offer you an object of ire.
Mark Rep. Peterson well, electorally speaking. Both he and those who support his position owe you an explanation for their stance on sugar price supports. And if that explanation isn't good enough--and one suspects that it won't be--you can make sure that Rep. Peterson and his supporters will be collecting their paychecks from a source other than the United States Treasury come January 2009.
Posted in Economy | Food Prices | Market Distortion | Price Supports — Comments (2)/ Email this page » / Read More »
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Recent comments
I am against all tax hikes when the government is more than 1/3
by JSobieskiI fully expect him to be a drummer. <NT>
by Moe LaneKeep up with the thread
by JoliphantDon't let the boy get behind;
by CrabCakesCalifornia voters put these
by MenloJohn, every comment has been addressing you
by simpson316Serious question: What is McCain's position on illegal alien
by spainishirishMy dad and I, we don't do politics anymore.
by Moe LaneTypical GOP scare tactics
by Fr Martin FoxAs an individual voter, the key question is this
by civil truthoppps that was for you JW
by speciallistWe have something in common..I was a Cold warrior too
by speciallistOld Style
by EzekielThat's good for a couple of hours.
by bloochDangit then
by Neil StevensBecause that's not where Fred's talent is
by gensecYou said you're are against all tax-hikes
by PopulistConservativeYeah, Moe, bitter is just not your style.
by CrabCakesYou seek to change a party by leaving it?
by simpson316Thanks for the advise, yours
by John Wayne