Voter ID

Posted at 10:15am on Apr. 28, 2008 BREAKING: Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Indiana Voter ID Law

Victory In The Battle To Prevent Voter Fraud

By Dan McLaughlin

6-3 plurality decision just came down, split with 3 Justices rejecting the facial challenge. More to follow.

Justice Scalia: “This is an area where the dos and don'ts need to be known in advance of the election ...It is for state legislatures to weigh the costs and benefits of possible changes to their election codes.”

UPDATES: Opinion here. Justice Stevens, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy, found no showing of an undue burden on various voters who challenged the voter ID law on its face. Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito would have upheld the law on the broader ground that it imposed the same requirements equally on all voters. Both opinions give great weight to the state interest in ensuring that only eligible voters cast ballots. Justice Souter, joined by Justices Breyer and Ginsburg, dissented.

This is a major defeat for the Democrats' efforts to prevent states from requiring valid identification to vote. The lawsuit was brought by the Indiana Democratic Party.

Justice Scalia's separate opinion is redolent of the judicial hangover from Bush v. Gore in its emphasis on the hazards of permitting case-by-case judicial review of neutral rules established by state legislatures before an election takes place.

More below the fold.

Posted in | | — Comments (21)/ Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:23am on Jan. 10, 2008 Liberals Look Like Losers in Voter ID Case

Anti-ID advocates embarrassed by one of their own

By Bluey

Yesterday's arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court case on an Indiana voter ID law couldn't have gone much worse for liberals who want to overturn the state's statute targeting vote fraud. Justices appeared inclined to reject arguments from the Indiana Democratic Party and ACLU and uphold two lower-court decisions favoring the Indiana law.

The court's swing vote, Justice Anthony Kennedy, dampened the left's hopes when he expressed skepticism about the requirements of the law. In questioning the lawyer for the state Democratic Party and ACLU, Kennedy asked, "You want us to invalidate a statute on the ground that it's a minor inconvenience to a small percentage of voters?" At a time when Americans are asked to show photo ID for routine things such as buying alcohol or getting on an airplane, it hardly seems unreasonable to do the same before voting.

But perhaps the best moment of the hour-long hearing came when Justice John Paul Stevens asked U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement whether Democrats were adversely impacted more than Republicans because of the state's photo ID requirement. Clement, who supports the Indiana law, shot back that that if "this was a cleverly designed mechanism by the Republican Party to disadvantage the Democratic Party, at least in 2006 it looks like it went pretty far awry."

Already facing an uphill battle in the courts, liberals were done in by one of their own yesterday when a woman cited by critics of the law was discovered to be a fraud herself. A story from KPC News added to an already lengthy list yet another example of how liberals cheat through the use of vote fraud.

Continued on the jump ...

Posted in | | | — Comments (23)/ Email this page » / Read More »

Syndicate content


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service